Anschlag auf Marriot Hotel in Pakistan

Moranthir

GröBaZ
Mitglied seit
11.10.2003
Beiträge
6.921
Reaktionen
11
Original geschrieben von Mackiavelli
Ein "friedliches Afghanistan" in dem Mittelalter gespielt wird und in dem Terroristen Unterschlupf finden ist genauso wenig wie ein aggressiv auftretender Iran der an Atomwaffen schraubt - es gibt Dinge die können wir nicht hinnehmen.
Ersteres kann ich genauso hinnehmen, wie afrikanische Diktatoren.



und du meinst also das die restlichen 80 bis 85 % der Bevölkerung Unterstützer der Taliban sind und waren und todunglücklich als diese gestürzt waren?
Da bin ich anderer Ansicht, ohne den ständigen Nachschub aus Pakistan wären die "Gotteskrieger" schon lange kein Thema mehr.
Du brauchst eine Masse von aktiven Leuten, die eine Sache unterstützen. Ob den Westen oder die Taliban. Und die aktiven Unterstützer der Taliban scheinen nicht wenige zu sein. Zudem sind z.B. die Amerikaner sehr verhasst (laut Veteranen). Dadurch gibt es auch Taliban Dulder, die ienfach mit den ISAF bzw. OEF Truppen nicht kooperieren...

Ohne den scheiß Irakkrieg wären die Gotteskrieger kein Thema mehr.
 
Mitglied seit
22.12.2004
Beiträge
1.688
Reaktionen
1
Ort
Oompa-Loompa-Land
Update

Source

Islamabad police complex attacked

At least eight people have been wounded in a suicide bomb attack inside the main police complex in Pakistan's capital, Islamabad, police have said.

Police said the attacker managed to drive into the Police Lines compound before blowing himself up inside a building of the anti-terrorist squad.

One police official told the BBC that at least one person had been killed.

The attack comes just over two weeks after more than 50 people died in a suicide bombing at the Marriott hotel.

It also happened as parliament met in a special joint session for a second day for a classified security briefing on Pakistan's internal security situation.

The joint session of parliament was called to try to help form a national consensus on how to tackle Islamic militancy and the recent surge in suicide bombings.

The inspector-general of Islamabad Police, Asghar Raza Gardezi, told the BBC the bomber had driven a green vehicle into the Police Lines complex shortly before midday and parked outside a three-storey building that houses the police's anti-terrorist wing.

He then got out of the car and entered the building, where he put a bag of sweets he claimed to be selling on the desk of a policeman, Mr Gardezi added.

Moments later, there was a large explosion which destroyed a corner of the building and left a large crater. Shoes were strewn among the rubble.

Amanat Khan, who was about 500m away from the blast when it happened, told the BBC that it caused panic on the streets.

"Everybody started running away from where the sound came. I saw black smoke rising and the sound of a building crashing down," he said. "It was a huge blast, just like an earthquake."

As well as housing the anti-terrorism building which was attacked, the Police Lines complex contains accomodation and training facilities for police. Senior police officials are based elsewhere.

Mr Gardezi said the authorities would be looking into why a civilian vehicle was allowed into the police compound in the first place, and how the bomber evaded security checks at the entrance.

Another police officer told the BBC that it had been fortunate that many of the officers stationed in the building had been guarding parliament and other areas of Islamabad at the time of the blast.
Source

Bomb hits school bus in Pakistan

At least eight people were killed when roadside bomb exploded close to a prison van and a school bus in north-western Pakistan, officials say.

The remote-controlled device exploded in the Upper Dir district of North-West Frontier Province near the Swat Valley.

Officials said those killed by the blast included at least two policemen, three prisoners and three children.

Earlier, a suicide bomb attack on the main police headquarters in Islamabad wounded at least eight people.

The bombings came just over two weeks after more than 50 people were killed and more than 260 wounded in a suicide bombing at the capital's Marriott hotel.

They also happened as parliament met in a special session for a second day for a classified security briefing on Pakistan's internal security situation.

The joint session was called to try to help form a national consensus on how to tackle Islamic militancy and the surge in suicide bombings.

Ach und wenn wir schon wieder beim Thema sind

Source


Germany set to boost Afghan role


The Berlin government has extended the mandate of Germany's military mission in Afghanistan for 14 months and agreed to deploy an extra 1,000 troops there.

The decision would keep German troops in Afghanistan until December 2009, boosting their number to 4,500.

The move requires approval by the lower house of parliament, which was due to debate the issue later on Tuesday.

Germany is currently the third biggest contributor to the 47,000 Nato-led force in Afghanistan.

Ahead of the debate in the lower house of parliament, the Bundestag, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier warned that it was "not very responsible to wave exit dates around".

Chancellor Angela Merkel's governing coalition has a majority in the Bundestag, which is expected to vote on the deployment issue next week.

Germany currently has 3,500 soldiers in Afghanistan, who are stationed in the relatively calm northern regions of the country.

kurz nach

Source

'Managing' the Afghan insurgency

In seven stark words, Brigadier Mark Carleton Smith - a man known for bold statements - summed up Britain's military campaign in Afghanistan.

"We're not going to win this war," he said during an interview with a British newspaper, the Sunday Times.

The UK's most senior commander added that we should not expect a "decisive military victory" in Afghanistan.

Perhaps what's so surprising about these remarks is that they have been so long in coming.

They may have been blunt and uncompromising - but reflect what many diplomats and military officials have being saying privately in the Afghan capital Kabul.

By almost all accounts, the fight against the Taleban and other anti-government forces, such as al-Qaeda, is not going well.

The number of insurgent attacks is increasing and the fighting is spreading across Afghanistan, particularly in the south and the east of the country.

US President George W Bush has said he will commit more troops to tackle the deteriorating security situation. In the face of this bleak outlook, however, Brigadier Carleton-Smith says that the international community must, essentially, downgrade what it hopes to achieve in Afghanistan.

The insurgency must be reduced to a "manageable" level in order that the Afghan army can take the lead.

And then there's the Taleban.

As with in past insurgencies, Brigadier Carleton-Smith, suggests that some political accommodation will need to be reached with the movement.

The training of the Afghan army is progressing, but the prevailing view is that it will be still a number of years before they can fight on their own two feet. That, ultimately, there can be no military solution to this conflict only a political one.

Yes, the military will play its part, killing, squeezing and harassing the Taleban and other anti-government forces, and attempting to provide security across the country.

Many Afghan officials and diplomats, however, believe certain elements of the Taleban represent the positions of the Afghan people and so should be a part of the country's future.

This is particularly the case in the south of the country, where Pashtun nationalism - which often feeds into the Taleban movement - is often passionately supported.

The Afghan government says that it is willing to reconcile with any members of the Taleban who recognise the legitimacy of their authority.

But the process, if it is to be followed, will be fraught with difficulties.

The big question is: who in the Taleban can you cut a deal with?

Will its senior leaders be willing to negotiate or are they too enmeshed with al-Qaeda to make any compromises?

And all of this is presuming that the Taleban want to talk. From their point of view, the strengthening insurgency and the destabilisation that comes with it may be just what they want.

:hammer:
 
Oben